kimi-k2-thinking-turbo is the Turbo invocation model in the Kimi K2 Thinking series, suitable for text tasks that require sustained reasoning, breaking down multiple constraints, and incorporating tool feedback. It can be a candidate for solution design, troubleshooting, and multi-turn technical assistance. The trade-offs with standard Thinking should be evaluated by comparing actual time, task quality, and billing using the same materials and identical conversation history.
Point the Base URL to api.acedata.cloud, configure your platform API key and the model ID below, and use your compatible SDK or client.
import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key=os.environ["ACEDATACLOUD_API_KEY"],
base_url="https://api.acedata.cloud/v1",
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="kimi-k2-thinking-turbo",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}],
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)Choose an available protocol for this model. OpenAI SDK uses a Base URL ending in /v1; Anthropic SDK uses the root URL. See each guide for protocol-specific parameters, tools and response formats.
First, clarify this model's input and standard invocation method.
Native model characteristics are for model selection; this platform's input limits, available parameters, and billing are subject to this model's API and pricing. Use stream for continuous output from Chat Completions; the client is responsible for preserving message history.
Learn what kimi-k2-thinking-turbo can bring to your work.
When a problem includes multiple conditions, mutually constraining goals, or requires phased judgment, you can provide the model with known facts, assumptions, and acceptance requirements together. Its purpose is not merely to generate a single conclusion, but to help address complex problems and produce explanations, solutions, and items to validate that are easy to review and discuss further.
Suitable for requests that need to analyze materials first, compare options next, and finally provide a deliverable. Prompts can clearly specify the order of steps, conditions that must not be overlooked, and the final output format, allowing complex reasoning to progress toward the same goal. When collaborating with tools, the application should handle actual execution and feed the execution results back into the conversation.
Turbo is an independent invocation option. When comparing, keep the input, history, and tool responses fixed, and observe wait time, missed task details, and areas requiring manual revision; do not treat the name as a guarantee of a fixed speed multiplier or identical output.
Start with specific tasks to identify where the model can be effective.
Provide project goals, resource constraints, dependencies, and candidate solutions, and ask the model to compare them using consistent criteria and deliver a recommended solution, reasons for the choice, and questions requiring confirmation. This is suitable for organizing scattered requirements into decision materials for discussion; when real budgets or critical business judgments are involved, the final decision should still be made using verified data.
Put error messages, relevant code text, expected behavior, and attempted approaches into the message, and ask the model to distinguish possible causes, list the validation order, and suggest modifications. Deliverables can include a troubleshooting checklist, remediation ideas, and testing points; running code and confirming the effectiveness of fixes are handled by the actual development environment.
Retain the versions of materials submitted to kimi-k2-thinking-turbo and the actual responses, distinguishing original facts, model suggestions, and actions already completed by the application. Before structured results enter the system, check required fields, value types, and business rules to avoid turning missing information directly into definitive records.
Choose based on task complexity, input materials, and expected results.
kimi-k2-thinking and kimi-k2-thinking-turbo are both public models designed for complex reasoning and multi-step tasks. When choosing Turbo, use your own representative tasks to compare answer completeness, instruction following, and actual response experience rather than inferring a fixed acceleration ratio from the name alone. Existing Turbo applications can retain this model and conduct regression testing around task quality.
Use /v1/chat/completions and explicitly set model=kimi-k2-thinking-turbo. Existing OpenAI-compatible applications can continue using their message and result handling; when integrating, configure the platform address, API Key, and exact model name.
Arrange the inputs first, then connect them to the corresponding application workflow.
Select a set of solution design examples requiring three to five follow-up rounds, and fix the input and tool return for each round.
Explicitly select kimi-k2-thinking-turbo in the Chat Completions request, and organize the background, materials, and output requirements for this request into messages. First use a task with a clearly defined scope to check the response, then put actual review or testing feedback into the next-round message.
Design tasks directly from the following inputs and acceptance priorities.
Please design a retrieval solution that meets these budget and latency constraints; first list the conditions to be confirmed, then adjust the design with supplementary materials and explain the changes.
Compare completion time, omissions, and the amount of manual editing using the same history as Thinking; the Turbo name does not replace actual latency and billing measurements on this platform.
Before formal use, understand the output quality and scope of capabilities.
Answers to common questions about using kimi-k2-thinking-turbo.
No. It is a publicly released Kimi K2 Thinking series model, launched alongside kimi-k2-thinking. Use the full ID kimi-k2-thinking-turbo when calling it; do not reuse K3 capacity specifications or reasoning control parameters simply because they belong to the same Kimi series.
This model should not use K3's reasoning_effort, nor should it use the thinking switch from K2.6. A more practical approach is to clearly specify the task objective, constraints, and acceptance criteria, and leave sufficient room for the response; this prompt design is used to organize tasks and is not equivalent to native reasoning budget control.
Submit model=kimi-k2-thinking-turbo and messages to /v1/chat/completions. Read normal results from choices[].message.content; use stream to obtain incremental results for streaming calls. Use this platform's API Key, and set the full base URL according to the SDK you use.
Streaming increments from Chat Completions may separately include content and reasoning_content. The interface can handle the main text and reasoning content separately, but must allow the reasoning field to be empty. Check finish_reason at the end; tool calls and length truncation should not be treated as ordinary complete responses.
Have the application save the message history, and include the user and assistant messages relevant to the current question in messages. Choose a solution-design example that requires three to five rounds of follow-up questions, and keep the input and tool returns fixed for each round. When materials or constraints change, update them with the next request.
Choose a development approach or application suited to this model and follow its setup guide.
↗OpenAI Chat Completions API
SDK installation, authentication and examples
↗Using Ace Data Cloud with Cherry Studio
Chat client setup · Base URL, API key and model
↗Using Ace Data Cloud with ChatBox
Chat client setup · Base URL, API key and model
↗Input
$0.37per 1M tokens
Official $0.91
Output
$2.65per 1M tokens
Official $6.63
You pay$13,584for 142,800 credits · $0.0951 / credits46% OFF
You're billed in credits. Pick a top-up tier to see its per-credit rate — the larger the top-up, the cheaper each credit.
This is only a basic call example. See the full docs for more parameters and advanced usage.
View Docs